1 Answer
Solution :-
The government in any democratic nation would intervene if some religious group says that their religion allows them to practice infanticide because this tradition goes against the Fundamental Right to Life. It involves the killing of an innocent and is, hence, unacceptable. The government, in this case, interferes by coercion. However, sometimes, the government may also intervene via support. For example, Sikhs in Delhi are excused from wearing helmets on two-wheelers because their religion demands them to wear a turban-a sacred tradition for them.
Answered by Monika | 2 years agoRelated Questions
This poster alongside highlights the need for 'Peace'. It says, “Peace is a neverending process... It cannot ignore our differences or overlook our common interests.” Write in your own words what you think the above sentences are trying to convey? How does it relate to the need for religious tolerance?
The Indian State both keeps away from religion as well as intervenes in religion. This idea can be quite confusing. Discuss this once again in class using examples from the chapter as well as those that you might have come up with.
Find out some examples of different views within the same religion.
Look up the annual calendar of holidays of your school. How many of them pertain to different religions? What does this indicate?
. Complete the following table:
| Objective | Why is this important? | Example of a violation of this objective |
| One religious community does not dominate another | ||
| The State does not enforce any particular religion nor take away the religious freedom of individuals. | ||
| That some members do not dominate other members of the same religious community. |